Re: New strsplit function

[Abbott, Ben]

On Jun 4, 2013, at 8:39 AM, Abbott, Ben wrote:

> On Jun 3, 2013, at 8:05 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
> 
>> On 05/16/2013 03:34 AM, Ben Abbott wrote:
>> 
>>> I've untangled the "legacy" option from the rest, and added some tests.  
>>> This "should" be compatible with Matlab.  If its ok with you, I'll push 
>>> this and follow up with another change to introduce cstrsplit.m and remove 
>>> the "legacy" code form strsplit.m
>> 
>> Sorry, I missed this message until now when I was looking to see what had 
>> happened with this change.
>> 
>> Yes, go ahead and apply the change.  Unfortunately, there may be some 
>> conflicts now as I see there was a recent change to strsplit.m to improve 
>> input argument checking.
>> 
>> I'm not sure about the name cstrsplit.  The cstrcat function was named that 
>> way because it behaves more like the C library function strcat, not because 
>> it is compatible with previous versions of Octave.  Maybe ostrsplit (o == 
>> old) instead?
>> 
>> jwe
> 
> 
> Ok, thanks for getting back to this.  I hope to clean this all up by the end 
> of the week.
> 
> Ben

John,

I case you missed my post to the tracker, this should be fixed now.  Let me 
know if you (anyone?) notices something I missed.

Ben