[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: help foo, with empty function foo
From: |
Juan Pablo Carbajal |
Subject: |
Re: help foo, with empty function foo |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:42:08 +0200 |
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Muhali <address@hidden> wrote:
> If foo.m contains only help text, e.g.
>
> % This is foo.
>
> then in ML 'help foo' displays that text while octave produces an error:
>
> error: help: 'foo' is not documented
>
> I am not sure if this is a bug.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/help-foo-with-empty-function-foo-tp4654726.html
> Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Octave has its own documentation syntax
http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/interpreter/Documentation-Tips.html#Documentation-Tips
I wouldn't say that not showing the documentation is breaking the
code. But I am not sure
- help foo, with empty function foo, Muhali, 2013/06/24
- Re: help foo, with empty function foo,
Juan Pablo Carbajal <=
- Re: help foo, with empty function foo, Doug Stewart, 2013/06/24
- Re: help foo, with empty function foo, Carnë Draug, 2013/06/24
- Re: help foo, with empty function foo, John W. Eaton, 2013/06/24
- Re: help foo, with empty function foo, Carnë Draug, 2013/06/24
- Re: help foo, with empty function foo, Doug Stewart, 2013/06/24
- Re: help foo, with empty function foo, John W. Eaton, 2013/06/24
- Re: help foo, with empty function foo, c., 2013/06/24
- Re: help foo, with empty function foo, Doug Stewart, 2013/06/24
- Re: help foo, with empty function foo, Doug Stewart, 2013/06/24
Message not available