|
From: | Doug Stewart |
Subject: | Re: help foo, with empty function foo |
Date: | Mon, 24 Jun 2013 09:53:10 -0400 |
Octave has its own documentation syntaxOn Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Muhali <address@hidden> wrote:
> If foo.m contains only help text, e.g.
>
> % This is foo.
>
> then in ML 'help foo' displays that text while octave produces an error:
>
> error: help: 'foo' is not documented
>
> I am not sure if this is a bug.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/help-foo-with-empty-function-foo-tp4654726.html
> Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/interpreter/Documentation-Tips.html#Documentation-Tips
I wouldn't say that not showing the documentation is breaking the
code. But I am not sure
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |