[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Further suggestions for Copyright Notices
From: |
Mike Miller |
Subject: |
Re: Further suggestions for Copyright Notices |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Jan 2020 12:50:38 -0800 |
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 21:41:55 +0100, ederag wrote:
> Just for information:
> if at some point a license short-form identifier would be useful,
> there is https://spdx.org/ids.
Personally I find both the standard GPL license statement and the SPDX
identifier to be useful, and I have started using both together in my
projects. Concretely:
## Copyright (C) 2019 Mike Miller
## SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later
##
## This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
## it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
## the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
## (at your option) any later version.
##
## This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
## but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
## MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
## GNU General Public License for more details.
##
## You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
## along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
I also updated Octave's parser in the version 6 branch so that the first
two lines can be swapped if the author wishes, and Octave will correctly
recognize "SPDX-License-Identifier" comment as the start of a license
block.
Cheers,
--
mike
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Link in Copyright Notices, (continued)
Re: Further suggestions for Copyright Notices, John W. Eaton, 2020/01/08
Re: Further suggestions for Copyright Notices, Rik, 2020/01/09