octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: pzmap(), bad options (control)


From: Nicholas Jankowski
Subject: Re: pzmap(), bad options (control)
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:44:23 -0500

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 1:54 PM GoSim <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> >> pzmap(tf([1 9],[1 2 2 4 5]))
> >> hold on
> >> pzmap(tf([1 8],[1 2 2 4 5]))
>
> same color, legend incorrect
>
> <https://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/t373066/pzmap.png>
>
>
> >> pzmap(tf([1 8],[1 2 2 4 5]))
> >> hold on
> >> pzmap(tf([1 9],[1 2 2 4 5]),'r')
>
> x:s and o:s are now a line and a dot, this is incorrect
>
> <https://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/t373066/pzmap1.png>
>
>
> pzmap(tf([1 9],[1 2 2 4 5]),'bx')
>
> everything is x now, can't see the zeros
>
> <https://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/t373066/pzmap2.png>
>
>

yes, definitely some matlab compatibility there.  see attached are
Matlab 2019a outputs coinciding with your three images.  would you
create a bug report at bugs.octave.org with all of these images
attached copy Doug Stewart <address@hidden> one of the package
maintainers on the report?

Attachment: pzmap2_matlab.png
Description: PNG image

Attachment: pzmap_matlab.png
Description: PNG image

Attachment: pzmap1_matlab.png
Description: PNG image


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]