octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: pzmap(), bad options (control)


From: GoSim
Subject: Re: pzmap(), bad options (control)
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:31:13 -0600 (CST)

nrjank wrote
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 1:54 PM GoSim <

> GoSim@

> > wrote:
>>
>> >> pzmap(tf([1 9],[1 2 2 4 5]))
>> >> hold on
>> >> pzmap(tf([1 8],[1 2 2 4 5]))
>>
>> same color, legend incorrect
>>
>> <https://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/t373066/pzmap.png>
>>
>>
>> >> pzmap(tf([1 8],[1 2 2 4 5]))
>> >> hold on
>> >> pzmap(tf([1 9],[1 2 2 4 5]),'r')
>>
>> x:s and o:s are now a line and a dot, this is incorrect
>>
>> <https://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/t373066/pzmap1.png>
>>
>>
>> pzmap(tf([1 9],[1 2 2 4 5]),'bx')
>>
>> everything is x now, can't see the zeros
>>
>> <https://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/t373066/pzmap2.png>
>>
>>
> 
> yes, definitely some matlab compatibility there.  see attached are
> Matlab 2019a outputs coinciding with your three images.  would you
> create a bug report at bugs.octave.org with all of these images
> attached copy Doug Stewart <

> doug.dastew@

> > one of the package
> maintainers on the report?
> 
> 
> pzmap2_matlab.png (20K)
> <https://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/attachment/4695535/0/pzmap2_matlab.png>
> pzmap_matlab.png (20K)
> <https://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/attachment/4695535/1/pzmap_matlab.png>
> pzmap1_matlab.png (20K)
> <https://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/attachment/4695535/2/pzmap1_matlab.png>

https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?57716

wasn't able to add his mail, probably because i'm not registred



--
Sent from: https://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Octave-Maintainers-f1638794.html



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]