[Octave-patch-tracker] [patch #10366] Same destructor order for octave_value:s in frame in std::vector for libstdc++ and libc++

[John W. Eaton]

Follow-up Comment #6, patch #10366 (project octave):

It seems reasonable to me to ensure that the classdef destructors called in
the same order for all versions of Octave regardless of what a particular
standard library implementation does to destroy vector elements.  In that
case, we should not assume that libstdc++ will always behave the way it does
now and we should enforce the behavior we want unconditionally.



    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?10366>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/