|
From: | Markus Mützel |
Subject: | [Octave-patch-tracker] [patch #10366] Same destructor order for octave_value:s in frame in std::vector for libstdc++ and libc++ |
Date: | Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:06:29 -0400 (EDT) |
Follow-up Comment #7, patch #10366 (project octave): I pushed the following change to use the non-default destructor unconditionally: https://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/829a32a4171c I also took the opportunity to use C++11 idioms for iterating over all loop elements. Is it really necessary to overwrite each element with a new `octave_value`? Or could we just erase all elements in a given order? _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?10366> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |