[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers
From: |
Frank Van Damme |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:44:08 +0200 |
On Saturday 13 April 2002 01:16 pm, you wrote:
> > You're wrong :) . There 's still other things on the 'net then news
> > (really ;) ) and in most groups I read binaries are strictly prohibited.
> > If you're on the web a lot, like IRC and fancy a download every now and
> > then, flat-fee is a must.
>
> I have no idea what you are talking about here. what does www and irc have
> to do with a premium news account? a free text-only account nntp account
> could be handy to not use any of your 6.25G account on non-binary posts I
> guess, eh.
Sorry, was still babbling about ISP's, not 'pure' news providers...
> > And you just don't compare google groups to Pan do you???
>
> I think GG is very good for what it is. I have no cap so I almost always
> use Pan except for historical/old seaches. Find me a nntp server with 21
> years of articles on it, and ... well no I won't use it, imagine loading up
> 21 years worth of articles from comp.lang.c for example!
Pan has an option to download only the latest X messages ;-)
And google groups is indeed, the google of usenet - searching and posting
when you can't get near a newsreader :)
> Pan can't compete with GG in some areas and GG can't compete in others,
> neither is 'better'.
Pan rules! :-) But apart from the fact it can't do full-text searches, Google
groups is no match, I wouldn't like having to use google groups for regular
posting and reading.
Frank
--
homepage: www.student.kuleuven.ac.be/~m9917684
jabber (=IM): address@hidden
No part of this copyright message may be reproduced, read or seen,
dead or alive or by any means, including but not limited to telepathy
without the benevolence of the author.
- [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers, (continued)
- [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers, Aristotle, 2002/04/12
- Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers, Charles Kerr, 2002/04/12
- Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers, Ben, 2002/04/12
- Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers, Chris Petersen, 2002/04/12
- Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers, James Hawtin, 2002/04/12
- Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers, John LeMay, 2002/04/12
- Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers, gaw zay, 2002/04/12
- Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers, John LeMay, 2002/04/12
- Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers, Frank Van Damme, 2002/04/13
- Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers, gaw zay, 2002/04/13
- Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers,
Frank Van Damme <=
- Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers, Charles Kerr, 2002/04/12
- Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers, John LeMay, 2002/04/12
- Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers, Frank Van Damme, 2002/04/13
- Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers, John LeMay, 2002/04/13
- Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers, James Hawtin, 2002/04/13
- Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers, Frank Van Damme, 2002/04/13
- Re: [Pan-users] Statistical word analysis?, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder, 2002/04/11
- Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Statistical word analysis?, Colin Leroy, 2002/04/11
- Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Statistical word analysis?, Rob, 2002/04/11
- Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Statistical word analysis?, Colin Leroy, 2002/04/11