pan-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers


From: Frank Van Damme
Subject: Re: [Pan-users] [OT] Commercial news servers
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:44:08 +0200

On Saturday 13 April 2002 01:16 pm, you wrote:
> > You're wrong :) . There 's still other things on the 'net then news
> > (really ;) ) and in most groups I read binaries are strictly prohibited.
> > If you're on the web a lot, like IRC and fancy a download every now and
> > then, flat-fee is a must.
>
> I have no idea what you are talking about here. what does www and irc have
> to do with a premium news account? a free text-only account nntp account
> could be handy to not use any of your 6.25G account on non-binary posts I
> guess, eh.

Sorry, was still babbling about ISP's, not 'pure' news providers...

> > And you just don't compare google groups to Pan do you???
>
> I think GG is very good for what it is. I have no cap so I almost always
> use Pan except for historical/old seaches. Find me a nntp server with 21
> years of articles on it, and ... well no I won't use it, imagine loading up
> 21 years worth of articles from comp.lang.c for example!

Pan has an option to download only the latest X messages ;-)

And google groups is indeed, the google of usenet - searching and posting 
when you can't get near a newsreader :)

> Pan can't compete with GG in some areas and GG can't compete in others,
> neither is 'better'.

Pan rules! :-) But apart from the fact it can't do full-text searches, Google 
groups is no match, I wouldn't like having to use google groups for regular 
posting and reading.

Frank



-- 
homepage:       www.student.kuleuven.ac.be/~m9917684
jabber (=IM):   address@hidden
No part of this copyright message may be reproduced, read or seen, 
dead or alive or by any means, including but not limited to telepathy  
without the benevolence of the author.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]