[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] Re: Signatures?
|
From: |
Toby A Inkster |
|
Subject: |
[Pan-users] Re: Signatures? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jan 2003 20:51:27 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Pan/0.13.3 (That cat's something I can't explain) |
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 17:24:42 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> 0.13.0 should work. However, there's a trick to it. The preferences sig
> slot
> is designed to take an executable, not just a text file. This is to allow
> "fortune cookie" type sig generators to work.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't Pan check the permissions on the
signature file? If the signature is an executable, Pan should run it and
display the output. Otherwise, Pan should just read the signature file in
as the signature.
--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
E-mail: address@hidden
PGP: http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/?id=12
Web Page: http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/
IM: AIM:inka80 ICQ:6622880 YIM:tobyink Jabber:address@hidden
Could I have a drug overdose?
- Re: [Pan-users] Signatures?, (continued)
- Re: [Pan-users] Signatures?, Søren Boll Overgaard, 2003/01/22
- Re: [Pan-users] Signatures?, Tim Kynerd, 2003/01/22
- Re: [Pan-users] Signatures?, Duncan, 2003/01/22
- Re: [Pan-users] Signatures?, Tim Kynerd, 2003/01/22
- Re: [Pan-users] Signatures?, Duncan, 2003/01/23
- Re: [Pan-users] Signatures?, Tim Kynerd, 2003/01/24
- Re: [Pan-users] Signatures?, Duncan, 2003/01/24
- Re: [Pan-users] Signatures?, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2003/01/24
- Re: [Pan-users] Signatures? [OT], Duncan, 2003/01/25
- Re: [Pan-users] Signatures? [OT], Anna, 2003/01/25
- [Pan-users] Re: Signatures?,
Toby A Inkster <=
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Signatures?, Duncan, 2003/01/23