pan-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Pan-users Digest, Vol 20, Issue 15


From: Brad Rogers
Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Re: Pan-users Digest, Vol 20, Issue 15
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:19:21 +0100

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:10:36 -0700
Duncan <address@hidden> wrote:

Hello Duncan,

> 4) Note that /all/ parts need to have the same number of digits in the
> extension for the above to get the order correct.  Thus
> .001-.009,.010... will work, but .1-.9,.10-.99,.100-.999... will NOT
> work, without renaming so the extensions line up.  The part ordering
> of the latter would be out of order because cat will be combining in
> alphabetical order.  An alternative to the renaming might be listing
> the ranges as necessary, tho I've not tried it.

It works, but you have to be careful about the input filename
extensions (* is no good, obviously).

-- 
 Regards   _
          / )        "The blindingly obvious is
         / _)rad     never immediately apparent"

Attachment: pgp8CmKmz6BYB.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]