[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Re: Pan-users Digest, Vol 20, Issue 15
From: |
Brad Rogers |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Re: Pan-users Digest, Vol 20, Issue 15 |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:19:21 +0100 |
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:10:36 -0700
Duncan <address@hidden> wrote:
Hello Duncan,
> 4) Note that /all/ parts need to have the same number of digits in the
> extension for the above to get the order correct. Thus
> .001-.009,.010... will work, but .1-.9,.10-.99,.100-.999... will NOT
> work, without renaming so the extensions line up. The part ordering
> of the latter would be out of order because cat will be combining in
> alphabetical order. An alternative to the renaming might be listing
> the ranges as necessary, tho I've not tried it.
It works, but you have to be careful about the input filename
extensions (* is no good, obviously).
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)rad never immediately apparent"
pgp8CmKmz6BYB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Pan-users] Re: Pan-users Digest, Vol 20, Issue 15, datasong, 2004/07/28
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Pan-users Digest, Vol 20, Issue 15, Grahame White, 2004/07/28
- [Pan-users] Re: Pan-users Digest, Vol 20, Issue 15, Duncan, 2004/07/28
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Pan-users Digest, Vol 20, Issue 15,
Brad Rogers <=
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Pan-users Digest, Vol 20, Issue 15, Jeff Vian, 2004/07/29
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Pan-users Digest, Vol 20, Issue 15, Brad Rogers, 2004/07/29
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Pan-users Digest, Vol 20, Issue 15, Jeff Vian, 2004/07/29
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Pan-users Digest, Vol 20, Issue 15, Brad Rogers, 2004/07/30
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Pan-users Digest, Vol 20, Issue 15, Rinaldi J. Montessi, 2004/07/29
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Pan-users Digest, Vol 20, Issue 15, Jeff Vian, 2004/07/29