[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] Re: server priority and completeless : EXAMPLE
From: |
Duncan |
Subject: |
[Pan-users] Re: server priority and completeless : EXAMPLE |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:51:06 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) |
George Czerw <address@hidden> posted
address@hidden, excerpted below, on Sat, 28 Mar
2009 12:08:20 -0400:
> style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px;
> margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;
> -qt-user-state:0;"></p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px;
> margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;
> -qt-user-state:0;">Beartooth,</p> <p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty;
> margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px;
> -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"></p> <p style="
> margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px;
> -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">Have you tried
> subscribing to motzarella.support and posting your problem there? They
> are pretty responsive to trouble reports.....</p></body></html>
Yikes! Just a sample of the mess you're posting. So that's the sort of
mess kmail creates in HTML mode, eh? (FWIW, I use kmail too, but NEVER
in HTML mode!) This is by far the most blatantly egregious HTML post
I've seen in some time. Please please please turn off that HTML!
As you likely know if you use pan, pan doesn't do HTML. There's reasons
for that (security, because it just looks bad to those who don't do HTML
for whatever reason, because no message worth reading actually needs HTML
to make it so and it's thus a popular choice of spammers and malware
authors to obscure their junk and make it look presentable,
traditionalism, take your pick). This is the pan list, which some of us
use pan (thru gmane.org) to read. If you can't be persuaded to turn it
off for other lists, at /least/ respect the pan position on the pan lists
and turn it off here.
Meanwhile, if I correctly found your content in that mess, I agree,
posting to motzerella.support sounds like a good idea. I know beartooth
posts to gmane.discuss as I see his posts there on occasion, so maybe
he's already tried motzerella.support, but maybe not, too.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: server priority and completeless : EXAMPLE, (continued)
- [Pan-users] Re: server priority and completeless : EXAMPLE, Beartooth, 2009/03/26
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: server priority and completeless : EXAMPLE, Alan Meyer, 2009/03/26
- [Pan-users] Re: server priority and completeless : EXAMPLE, Duncan, 2009/03/26
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: server priority and completeless : EXAMPLE, Bernt Hansson, 2009/03/27
- [Pan-users] Re: server priority and completeless : EXAMPLE, Duncan, 2009/03/27
- [Pan-users] Re: server priority and completeless : EXAMPLE, Beartooth, 2009/03/27
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: server priority and completeless : EXAMPLE, Gerald L, 2009/03/27
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: server priority and completeless : EXAMPLE, George Czerw, 2009/03/28
- [Pan-users] Re: server priority and completeless : EXAMPLE,
Duncan <=
- [Pan-users] Re: server priority and completeless : EXAMPLE, Beartooth, 2009/03/29
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: server priority and completeless : EXAMPLE, George Czerw, 2009/03/29
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: server priority and completeless : EXAMPLE, Travis, 2009/03/29
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: server priority and completeless : EXAMPLE, George Czerw, 2009/03/29
- [Pan-users] Re: server priority and completeless : EXAMPLE, Duncan, 2009/03/29
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: server priority and completeless, Travis, 2009/03/26
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: server priority and completeless, Joe Zeff, 2009/03/26