pan-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Pan-users] SIGSEGV @ socket-impl-gio.cc:502 (abort_flag)


From: Heinrich Mueller
Subject: [Pan-users] SIGSEGV @ socket-impl-gio.cc:502 (abort_flag)
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:49:01 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)

sorry for  "crossposting", just don't know if "pan-devel" is still active :D

error:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7f61faa28790 (LWP 12446)]
0x000000000052431a in pan::GIOChannelSocket::gio_func (this=0x3281b60,
   channel=0x8e98340, cond=G_IO_IN) at socket-impl-gio.cc:502
502             if (_abort_flag)        _listener->on_socket_abort (this);

OS: 64 bit ubuntu jaunty 9.04, latest version from SVN.

code snippet //

/if (_abort_flag)
{
  _listener->on_socket_abort (this);
}
else if (!(cond & (G_IO_IN | G_IO_OUT)))
{
  _listener->on_socket_error (this);
}
else // G_IO_IN or G_IO_OUT
{
  const DoResult result = (cond & G_IO_IN) ? do_read () : do_write ();
  /*  if (_abort_flag)        _listener->on_socket_abort (this);
  else*/ if (result == IO_ERR)   _listener->on_socket_error (this);
  else if (result == IO_READ)  set_watch_mode (READ_NOW);
  else if (result == IO_WRITE) set_watch_mode (WRITE_NOW);
}/


//
sorry for not posting a backtrace, but the error just took too long to be bothered
to be reproduced ...

isn't the second appearance of abort_flag a dupe? it was already checked before by the first "if" branch... i commented that and got no errors so far (opposed to random segfaults before) :D




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]