[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] imu sensor filtering?
From: |
Chris |
Subject: |
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] imu sensor filtering? |
Date: |
Mon, 20 May 2013 18:37:48 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
Well here is what i came up with after battling with vibrations for 6 hours.
Tomorrow i will try mounting the IMU on top of a 1,4 Kg lipo battery and
see what happens.
Picture of my "antivibration mount" :-)
As it turns out the scaled readings must be at "m/s" so here is a screen
shot of the plotter output
Those readings are not software filtered.
Of interest is that when i increase the throttle (from 190 to 205) the
"x" axis vibrations increase
while the " y" axis decrease if i am reading this correctly.
Chris
On 05/20/2013 10:30 AM, address@hidden wrote:
Be aware it is NOT the most elegantly designed vibration damping solution...
for one it is very heavy. A nicer solution is to better integrate batteries
(already a considerable mass) into the system, as pointed out by Christophe in
a number of mailing list posts (not sure which ones right now...).
Thanks,-Stephen Dwyer
DSC00054.jpg
Description: JPEG image
13_05_20__11_34_09.png
Description: PNG image
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] imu sensor filtering?, (continued)
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] imu sensor filtering?, Chris Efstathiou, 2013/05/20
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] imu sensor filtering?, Chris Efstathiou, 2013/05/20
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] imu sensor filtering?,
Chris <=
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] imu sensor filtering?, Chris, 2013/05/21
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] imu sensor filtering?, Chris, 2013/05/22
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] imu sensor filtering?, Chris, 2013/05/23
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] imu sensor filtering?, Chris, 2013/05/24