|
From: | Chris |
Subject: | Re: [Paparazzi-devel] nav.h missing? SOLVED |
Date: | Fri, 30 May 2014 22:29:08 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 |
So far it looks that the receiver has the same or better sensitivity
with it's analog counterpart. The real testing will be done in a few weeks over the sea. In ground testing with and without obstacles i lost video at about the same or slightly more distance than the analog tx of comparable power which is very promising. Fhss also works well as seen on a spectrum analyser, the moving scene video quality is very nice and latency is small enough at ~150-200 ms. I wouldn't fly fpv with it but ~200 ms are not bad for watching around. I have also noticed some dropped frames but i need to do some more testing. The strong point of this system is that you can use a common power bidirectional wifi amplifier to increase range (i now use 4w of rf power measured) and interference on the airplane is far less than the analog video tx. I successfully used an 2.4 ghz rc receiver along with this 2.4 ghz video transmitter (at +18dbm) with no ill effects on rc range. Chris On 05/30/2014 10:10 PM, Eduardo
lavratti wrote:
|
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |