|
From: | Eduardo lavratti |
Subject: | Re: [Paparazzi-devel] nav.h missing? SOLVED |
Date: | Fri, 30 May 2014 17:28:21 -0300 |
wow ... 4w is much power.
Please, when you have idea on how much long you can fly using this solution ... tell me. Today i can fly more than 4km using 600mw 5.8ghz fatshark clone transmitter with good video signal. i like this digital video system but its too expansive. http://www.nghobbies.com/cart/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=1_147 Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 22:29:08 +0300 From: address@hidden To: address@hidden Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] nav.h missing? SOLVED So far it looks that the receiver has the same or better sensitivity with it's analog counterpart. The real testing will be done in a few weeks over the sea. In ground testing with and without obstacles i lost video at about the same or slightly more distance than the analog tx of comparable power which is very promising. Fhss also works well as seen on a spectrum analyser, the moving scene video quality is very nice and latency is small enough at ~150-200 ms. I wouldn't fly fpv with it but ~200 ms are not bad for watching around. I have also noticed some dropped frames but i need to do some more testing. The strong point of this system is that you can use a common power bidirectional wifi amplifier to increase range (i now use 4w of rf power measured) and interference on the airplane is far less than the analog video tx. I successfully used an 2.4 ghz rc receiver along with this 2.4 ghz video transmitter (at +18dbm) with no ill effects on rc range. Chris On 05/30/2014 10:10 PM, Eduardo
lavratti wrote:
_______________________________________________ Paparazzi-devel mailing list address@hidden https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |