pspp-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Multiple response tables


From: Matthias Faeth
Subject: Re: Multiple response tables
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 08:46:26 +0200

Yeah!

👍

Matthias Fäth
Calle San Ramon 5
ES- 46780 Oliva
Handy DE: +49 171 98 32 175
Movile ES: +34 682 33 94 02


Am Do., 11. Mai 2023 um 17:39 Uhr schrieb Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu>:
Multiple response features get requested fairly often, so I do plan to work on them. It will still be months, most likely, before I get to it.

On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 8:25 AM <Curtis.Szeto@hongkong.messefrankfurt.com> wrote:

Hi, I am new to PSPP and we are assessing if we can switch from SPSS (existing customer of) to PSPP. We found PSPP is great and almost meets all our requirements, but there is one possible blocker -  PSPP does not support crosstabs with multiple response questions currently.  Attached is an example based on SPSS together with a data file – it serves to illustrate the kind of multiple response support we need.

 

I found on pspp archives a recent thread (dated in 17 Apr 2023) on the topic, which wrote:

 

==============================================

From: Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu>
Sent: Monday, 17 April 2023 06:02
To: Matt Balogh <mbalogh@bloggs.id.au>
Cc: pspp-users@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Multiple response tables

 

PSPP doesn't support multiple response tables yet. CTABLES will be supported in the upcoming release, but multiple response variables aren't part of the support yet.

 

Tables can be given headings. The documentation for CTABLES covers it.

==============================================

 

It gave a hope that the support is coming soon, however, it said ‘multiple response variables aren’t part of the support yet.’  May I clarify if it meant even with the upcoming release, the CTABLES support for multiple response variable/question will still not be ready? If it won’t be ready in next release, then any idea when it might be ready?

 

Regards,

 

Curtis


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]