Re: [PATCH v9 05/21] job.c: add job_lock/unlock while keeping job.h intact

[Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy]

On 7/11/22 10:30, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> Am 08/07/2022 um 21:25 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
> > >    static bool job_started(Job *job)
> >
> > So we can call it both with mutex locked and without. Hope it never race
> > with job_start.
>
> Where exactly do you see it called with mutex not held?
>
> I don't see it anywhere, and if you agree too, we should rename it in
> _locked.

Oh, right, I agree.

--
Best regards,
Vladimir