Re: [RFC PATCH 2/8] transactions: add tran_add_back

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 7/14/22 17:13, Hanna Reitz wrote:
> > that we want to run before the others but still only when invoking
> > finalize/commit/abort.
>
> I don’t understand this yet (but perhaps it’ll become clearer with the 
> following patches); doesn’t the new function do the opposite? I.e., 
> basically add some clean-up that’s only used after everything else?

I agree about the commit message being incorrect, but is there any 
reason why transactions work LIFO by default?  Is there anything that 
requires that behavior?

Paolo