|
From: | Markus Armbruster |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 13/35] hmp_change(): don't access DeviceEncrypted's data |
Date: | Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:02:21 +0200 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) |
Luiz Capitulino <address@hidden> writes: > It's not needed. The device name is already known and > monitor_read_block_device_key() knows how to do the rest. This overly > simplifies hmp_change(). "overly"? My usual complaint about commit messages is that they fail to explain the change's purpose. Yours explains your reason just fine, but the description of what's done falls a bit short. I'd like to see something like "replace duplicated password prompting code by common monitor_read_block_device_key()".
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |