[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 2/2] Check value for invalid nega
From: |
Gerd Hoffmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 2/2] Check value for invalid negative values |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:56:39 +0200 |
On Do, 2015-06-18 at 06:45 -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > On Do, 2015-06-18 at 05:58 -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > For the same reason there is the v >= l test.
> > > The v >= l test state that the value can be out of range so it not always
> > > a
> > > constant in the range.
> > > Adding the v < 0 check for every invalid value. As these are executed only
> > > for logging should not be a performance penalty.
> > > I also hope the compiler is able to optimize
> > >
> > > if (v < 0 || v >= l)
> > >
> > > with
> > >
> > > if ((unsigned) v >= l)
> >
> > Just make v explicitly unsigned?
> >
> > cheers,
> > Gerd
> >
>
> Do you mean in the prototype?
Yes.
> Well, this could have side effect due to different conversions so is not a so
> trivial patch.
What side effects? I don't expect any for in-range values, and how
exactly we catch out-of-range values doesn't really matter ...
cheers,
Gerd
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Constify some variable, Michael Tokarev, 2015/06/17