qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/9] kvm: First step to push iothread lock out o


From: Fam Zheng
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/9] kvm: First step to push iothread lock out of inner run loop
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:45:50 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Tue, 06/23 11:29, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 23/06/2015 11:26, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Thu, 06/18 18:47, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> From: Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>
> >>
> >> This opens the path to get rid of the iothread lock on vmexits in KVM
> >> mode. On x86, the in-kernel irqchips has to be used because we otherwise
> >> need to synchronize APIC and other per-cpu state accesses that could be
> >> changed concurrently.
> >>
> >> s390x and ARM should be fine without specific locking as their
> >> pre/post-run callbacks are empty. MIPS and POWER require locking for
> >> the pre-run callback.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>
> >> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >>  kvm-all.c         | 14 ++++++++++++--
> >>  target-i386/kvm.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>  target-mips/kvm.c |  4 ++++
> >>  target-ppc/kvm.c  |  4 ++++
> >>  4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
> >> index b2b1bc3..2bd8e9b 100644
> >> --- a/kvm-all.c
> >> +++ b/kvm-all.c
> >> @@ -1795,6 +1795,8 @@ int kvm_cpu_exec(CPUState *cpu)
> >>          return EXCP_HLT;
> >>      }
> >>  
> >> +    qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
> >> +
> >>      do {
> >>          MemTxAttrs attrs;
> >>  
> >> @@ -1813,11 +1815,9 @@ int kvm_cpu_exec(CPUState *cpu)
> >>               */
> >>              qemu_cpu_kick_self();
> >>          }
> >> -        qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
> >>  
> >>          run_ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cpu, KVM_RUN, 0);
> >>  
> >> -        qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
> >>          attrs = kvm_arch_post_run(cpu, run);
> >>  
> >>          if (run_ret < 0) {
> >> @@ -1836,20 +1836,24 @@ int kvm_cpu_exec(CPUState *cpu)
> >>          switch (run->exit_reason) {
> >>          case KVM_EXIT_IO:
> >>              DPRINTF("handle_io\n");
> >> +            qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
> >>              kvm_handle_io(run->io.port, attrs,
> >>                            (uint8_t *)run + run->io.data_offset,
> >>                            run->io.direction,
> >>                            run->io.size,
> >>                            run->io.count);
> >> +            qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
> >>              ret = 0;
> >>              break;
> >>          case KVM_EXIT_MMIO:
> >>              DPRINTF("handle_mmio\n");
> >> +            qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
> >>              address_space_rw(&address_space_memory,
> >>                               run->mmio.phys_addr, attrs,
> >>                               run->mmio.data,
> >>                               run->mmio.len,
> >>                               run->mmio.is_write);
> >> +            qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
> >>              ret = 0;
> >>              break;
> >>          case KVM_EXIT_IRQ_WINDOW_OPEN:
> >> @@ -1858,7 +1862,9 @@ int kvm_cpu_exec(CPUState *cpu)
> >>              break;
> >>          case KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN:
> >>              DPRINTF("shutdown\n");
> >> +            qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
> >>              qemu_system_reset_request();
> >> +            qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
> >>              ret = EXCP_INTERRUPT;
> >>              break;
> >>          case KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN:
> > 
> > More context:
> > 
> >            fprintf(stderr, "KVM: unknown exit, hardware reason %" PRIx64 
> > "\n",
> >                    (uint64_t)run->hw.hardware_exit_reason);
> >            ret = -1;
> >            break;
> >        case KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR:
> > *          ret = kvm_handle_internal_error(cpu, run);
> 
> This one only accesses data internal to the VCPU thread.
> 
> >            break;
> >        case KVM_EXIT_SYSTEM_EVENT:
> >            switch (run->system_event.type) {
> >            case KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SHUTDOWN:
> > *              qemu_system_shutdown_request();
> >                ret = EXCP_INTERRUPT;
> >                break;
> >            case KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_RESET:
> > *              qemu_system_reset_request();
> 
> These two are thread-safe.

But above you add lock/unlock around the qemu_system_reset_request() under
KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN.  What's different?

Fam

> 
> Paolo
> 
> >                ret = EXCP_INTERRUPT;
> >>              break;
> >>          default:
> >>              DPRINTF("kvm_arch_handle_exit\n");
> >> +            qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
> >>              ret = kvm_arch_handle_exit(cpu, run);
> >> +            qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
> >>              break;
> >>          }
> >>      } while (ret == 0);
> >>  
> >> +    qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
> >> +
> >>      if (ret < 0) {
> >>          cpu_dump_state(cpu, stderr, fprintf, CPU_DUMP_CODE);
> >>          vm_stop(RUN_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR);
> > 
> > Could you explain why above three "*" calls are safe?
> > 
> > Fam
> > 
> > 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]