[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: add query-gic-capability SMP comman
From: |
Andrea Bolognani |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: add query-gic-capability SMP command |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Mar 2016 10:55:54 +0100 |
On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 12:23 +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> v3 changes:
> - patch 2: remove func declaration, add qmp header [Drew]
> - patch 3: being able to detect KVM GIC capabilities even without
> kvm enabled [Andrea]: this is a little bit hacky, need some more
> review on this.
>
> v2 changes:
> - result layout change: use array and dict for the capability bits
> rather than a single array of strings [Andrea/Markus]
> - spelling out what GIC is in doc [Eric]
>
> This patch is to add ARM-specific command "query-gic-capability".
>
> The new command can report which kind of GIC device the host/QEMU
> support. The returned result is in the form of array.
>
> Sample command and output:
>
> {"execute": "query-gic-capability"}
> {"return": [{"emulated": false, "version": 3, "kernel": false},
> {"emulated": true, "version": 2, "kernel": true}]}
>
> Testing:
>
> Smoke tests on both x86 (emulated) and another moonshot ARM server.
>
> Peter Xu (3):
> arm: qmp: add GICCapability struct
> arm: qmp: add query-gic-capability interface
> arm: implement query-gic-capability
>
> monitor.c | 8 ++++
> qapi-schema.json | 33 ++++++++++++++++
> qmp-commands.hx | 26 ++++++++++++
> scripts/qapi.py | 1 +
> target-arm/machine.c | 109
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 177 insertions(+)
I tested this both on a v2-only machine
{"return": [
{"emulated": false, "version": 3, "kernel": false},
{"emulated": true, "version": 2, "kernel": true}
]}
and on a v3-only machine
{"return": [
{"emulated": false, "version": 3, "kernel": true},
{"emulated": true, "version": 2, "kernel": false}
]}
The output looks good to me - I'll leave reviewing the
implementation to someone with more QEMU knowledge than me, that
is, any QEMU knowledge at all ;)
One last, purely cosmetic, bit: should the command name be
query-gic-capabilities rather than query-gic-capability? Any
native speaker feels like weighing in?
Cheers.
--
Andrea Bolognani
Software Engineer - Virtualization Team