[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags?
From: |
David Woodhouse |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2016 10:34:41 +0000 |
On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 09:52 +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Strawman alert: we don't *enforce* rebase. We leave it to the
> maintainer's discretion. Nothing stops a maintainer (or a chain of
> them) from accepting pull requests.
Which is all I was asking EDK2 to do. They *do* enforce rebase, which
is wrong.
Laszlo appeared to be saying "but qemu works like this; are they wrong
too?".
To which the answer is apparently "no, they don't work like this."
Thanks for clearing that up.
--
dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- Re: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags?, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags?, David Woodhouse, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags?, Peter Maydell, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags?, David Woodhouse, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags?, Peter Maydell, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags?, David Woodhouse, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags?, Laszlo Ersek, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags?, David Woodhouse, 2016/03/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags?, Markus Armbruster, 2016/03/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags?,
David Woodhouse <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags?, Laszlo Ersek, 2016/03/10