qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/1] EDK2 firmware patches


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/1] EDK2 firmware patches
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 16:11:40 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0

Hi Peter,

On 8/5/19 3:13 PM, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> On 8/3/19 12:22 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 at 09:26, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit 9bcf2dfa163f67b0fec6ee0fe88ad5dc5d69dc59:
>>>
>>>   Merge remote-tracking branch 
>>> 'remotes/elmarco/tags/slirp-CVE-2019-14378-pull-request' into staging 
>>> (2019-08-02 13:06:03 +0100)
>>>
>>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>>
>>>   https://gitlab.com/philmd/qemu.git tags/edk2-next-20190803
>>>
>>> for you to fetch changes up to 177cd674d6203d3c1a98e170ea56c5a904ac4ce8:
>>>
>>>   Makefile: remove DESTDIR from firmware file content (2019-08-03 09:52:32 
>>> +0200)
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> A harmless build-sys patch that fixes a regression affecting Linux
>>> distributions packaging QEMU.
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Olaf Hering (1):
>>>   Makefile: remove DESTDIR from firmware file content
>>
>> Is this pullreq intended for 4.1 ?

Sorry, I was not sure how to comment on the pullreq cover (everything
between the '---' lines get include in the merge commit description).

This fix a regression introduced during the current development cycle.
Already 3 different distributions hit this issue and complained (Suse,
ArchLinux and Fedora).
This is not a critical/security issue and distributions can easily
backport this patch, but since there is a RC4 planned, it would be nice
regarding distributors to fix this if possible.

> Please do pull it into 4.1 as the commit it fixes is aiming at 4.1 (just
> like the whole feature). If not included then distros will need to
> backport it anyway. Just my $0.02. Let's wait for Philippe's confirmation.
Exactly.

Thanks,

Phil.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]