Re: [Qemu-devel] more automated/public CI for QEMU pullreqs

[Dr. David Alan Gilbert]

* Paolo Bonzini (address@hidden) wrote:
> On 22/08/19 18:31, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >> With both these points in mind, I think it is  pretty hard sell to
> >> say we should write & maintain a custom CI system just for QEMU
> >> unless it is offering major compelling functionality we can't do
> >> without.

(That was Dan's comment)

> In theory I agree.
> 
> In practice, the major compelling functionality is portability.  If it
> is true that setting up runners is problematic even on aarch64, frankly
> GitLab CI is dead on arrival.  If it is not true, then I'd be very happy
> to use GitLab CI too.

IMHO if for some weird reason Gitlab has problems on aarch64 then we just need 
to get that
fixed.

Dave

> Paolo
> 
> > I'd agree; and I'd also find it useful to have runners setup for
> > Gitlab CI for related things (it would be useful for the virtio-fs
> > stuff);  if there are problems on other architectures then we should
> > find some go wranglers to go fix it.
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK