Hi Jan,
On 8/27/19 9:49 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 04:58:18PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 21.07.19 10:58, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>
nb_queue was not zeroed so that we no longer delivered events if a
previous guest left the device in an overflow state.
The state of absolute does not matter as the next vmmouse_update_handler
call will align it again.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>
---
hw/i386/vmmouse.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/hw/i386/vmmouse.c b/hw/i386/vmmouse.c
index 5d2d278be4..e335bd07da 100644
--- a/hw/i386/vmmouse.c
+++ b/hw/i386/vmmouse.c
@@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ static void vmmouse_reset(DeviceState *d)
VMMouseState *s = VMMOUSE(d);
s->queue_size = VMMOUSE_QUEUE_SIZE;
+ s->nb_queue = 0;
Don't we also need to reset the status in case vmmouse_get_status() is
called directly after reset?
s->status = 0;
With it:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
vmmouse_disable(s);
}
--
2.16.4
Ping - or who is looking after this?
Despite being in hw/i386, I think we can say vmmouse.c doesn't
have a maintainer. Last time someone changed vmmouse.c in a
meaningful way (not just adapting to API changes or removing
duplicate code) was in 2012.
Well it does has a few:
$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f hw/i386/vmmouse.c
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden> (supporter:PC)
Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden> (supporter:PC)
Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> (maintainer:X86 TCG CPUs)
Richard Henderson <address@hidden> (maintainer:X86 TCG CPUs)
Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> (maintainer:X86 TCG CPUs)
However the correct section should rather be "PC Chipset".
But the change makes sense to me, so:
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
I'll queue it.