Re: [PATCH] memory: Replace DEBUG_UNASSIGNED printf calls by trace events

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 07:20:34 PDT (-0700), Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:17, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I think it's simplest if all series (RISC-V, remove unassigned_access,
> > this one) go through the RISC-V tree.
>
> I don't inherently object but IME the risc-v tree tends to move
> comparatively slowly. The initial risc-v conversion patchset
> should definitely go via the risc-v tree, anyway.

We still don't have the riscv_cpu_unassigned_access() removal patches in, which 
IIRC got blocked on review but I can no longer dig out of my inbox.  IIRC the 
patches Alistair sent were still "From: Palmer", which means I can't review 
them.

I'm fine taking this on top of those, but it looks like there's still some 
debate about the patch itself.  I don't see a v2.