Re: [PATCH] memory: Replace DEBUG_UNASSIGNED printf calls by trace events

[Alistair Francis]

On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:41 PM Alistair Francis <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:41 PM Palmer Dabbelt <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 07:20:34 PDT (-0700), Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:17, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >> I think it's simplest if all series (RISC-V, remove unassigned_access,
> > >> this one) go through the RISC-V tree.
> > >
> > > I don't inherently object but IME the risc-v tree tends to move
> > > comparatively slowly. The initial risc-v conversion patchset
> > > should definitely go via the risc-v tree, anyway.
> >
> > We still don't have the riscv_cpu_unassigned_access() removal patches in, 
> > which
> > IIRC got blocked on review but I can no longer dig out of my inbox.  IIRC 
> > the
> > patches Alistair sent were still "From: Palmer", which means I can't review
> > them.
>
> The patches are reviewed by Richard and Philippe, they should be ready to 
> merge.

Just sent a v2, so you should be able to find them now.

Alistair

>
> Alistair
>
> >
> > I'm fine taking this on top of those, but it looks like there's still some
> > debate about the patch itself.  I don't see a v2.
> >