qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 8/8] target/avr: Register AVR support with th


From: Aleksandar Markovic
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 8/8] target/avr: Register AVR support with the rest of QEMU, the build system, and the MAINTAINERS file
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 14:24:04 +0200


12.10.2019. 09.31, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <address@hidden> је написао/ла:
>
> Hi Sarah,
>
>
> On 5/10/19 1:17 PM, Sarah Harris wrote:
>>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> Having discussed with my colleagues, we don't have the resources to maintain this.
>> If you wanted to take up Michael's offer then I'm happy to respond to queries and provide minor fixes.
>> Otherwise, we will make our repository publicly available in the near future for anyone who wants to use it.
>
>
> Would you agree to be listed as reviewer for AVR (Michael being the maintainer)?
>

I support this idea, and hopefully Sarah agrees. Reviewer role typically require mucj less tome resources.

>   M: Mail patches to: FullName <address@domain>
>      Maintainers are looking after a certain area and must be CCed on
>      patches. They are considered the main contact point.
>   R: Designated reviewer: FullName <address@domain>
>      These reviewers should be CCed on patches.
>      Reviewers are familiar with the subject matter and provide feedback
>      even though they are not maintainers.
>
>
>> Kind regards,
>> Sarah Harris
>>
>> On Sun, 5 May 2019 09:10:00 -0700
>> Michael Rolnik <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Richard.
>>>
>>> I can maintain it
>>>
>>> Sent from my cell phone, please ignore typos
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 5, 2019, 8:57 AM Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/4/19 1:36 AM, Sarah Harris wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sarah Harris <address@hidden>
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +AVR
>>>>> +M: Michael Rolnik <address@hidden>
>>>>> +S: Odd Fixes
>>>>> +F: target-avr/
>>>>> +F: hw/avr/
>>>>> +
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is not how things work.  Michael wasn't up to maintaining the code 2
>>>> years
>>>> ago; that's why it was never committed.
>>>>
>>>> You would need to maintain this yourself, and for more than "Odd Fixes".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> r~
>>>>
>>
>
>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]