[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 0/2] virtiofsd: Two fix for xattr operation
|
From: |
Miklos Szeredi |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 0/2] virtiofsd: Two fix for xattr operation |
|
Date: |
Thu, 17 Oct 2019 15:01:08 +0200 |
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 1:23 PM Miklos Szeredi <address@hidden> wrote:
> I see why this is being done, and it's not easy to fix properly
> without the ..at() versions of these syscalls. One idea is to fork()
> + fchdir(lo->proc_self_fd) + ..xattr(). Another related idea is to do
> a unshare(CLONE_FS) after each thread's startup (will pthread library
Apparently Samba does this, so it should be safe.
Thanks,
Miklos
- [PATCH 0/2] virtiofsd: Two fix for xattr operation, Misono Tomohiro, 2019/10/16
- [PATCH 2/2] virtiofsd: Allow setxattr operation to directry, Misono Tomohiro, 2019/10/16
- [PATCH 1/2] virtiofsd: Avoid process hang when doing xattr operation to FIFO, Misono Tomohiro, 2019/10/16
- Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 0/2] virtiofsd: Two fix for xattr operation, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2019/10/17
- Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 0/2] virtiofsd: Two fix for xattr operation, Miklos Szeredi, 2019/10/17
- Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 0/2] virtiofsd: Two fix for xattr operation, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2019/10/17
- Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 0/2] virtiofsd: Two fix for xattr operation, Miklos Szeredi, 2019/10/17
- Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 0/2] virtiofsd: Two fix for xattr operation, Miklos Szeredi, 2019/10/18
- Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 0/2] virtiofsd: Two fix for xattr operation, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2019/10/18
- RE: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 0/2] virtiofsd: Two fix for xattr operation, address@hidden, 2019/10/18
- Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 0/2] virtiofsd: Two fix for xattr operation, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2019/10/21
- RE: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 0/2] virtiofsd: Two fix for xattr operation, address@hidden, 2019/10/23
- Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 0/2] virtiofsd: Two fix for xattr operation, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2019/10/25