[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904
From: |
Laurent Vivier |
Subject: |
Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904 |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Sep 2020 19:26:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 |
On 07/09/2020 18:29, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> On 07/09/2020 16:51, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 16:31:24 +0200
>> Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/09/2020 16:05, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>> Hi Thiago,
>>>>
>>>> On 9/7/20 3:29 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>>>> On 07/09/2020 04:38, David Gibson wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 04:20:10PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> The 'check-tcg' tests for the linux-user static build also
>>>>>>> failed on an s390x test:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CHECK debian-s390x-cross
>>>>>>> BUILD s390x-linux-user guest-tests with docker
>>>>>>> qemu/debian-s390x-cross
>>>>>>> RUN tests for s390x
>>>>>>> TEST threadcount on s390x
>>>>>>> Unhandled trap: 0x10003
>>>>>
>>>>> This is EXCP_HALTED (include/exec/cpu-all.h)
>>>>>
>>>>> The message error comes from cpu_loop() in linux-user/s390x/cpu_loop.c.
>>>>>
>>>>> The trap can only come from accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c
>>>>>
>>>>> 679 int cpu_exec(CPUState *cpu)
>>>>> 680 {
>>>>> ...
>>>>> 688 if (cpu_handle_halt(cpu)) {
>>>>> 689 return EXCP_HALTED;
>>>>> 690 }
>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>> 428 static inline bool cpu_handle_halt(CPUState *cpu)
>>>>> 429 {
>>>>> 430 if (cpu->halted) {
>>>>> ...
>>>>> 441 if (!cpu_has_work(cpu)) {
>>>>> 442 return true;
>>>>> 443 }
>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>> 58 static bool s390_cpu_has_work(CPUState *cs)
>>>>> 59 {
>>>>> 60 S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(cs);
>>>>> 61
>>>>> 62 /* STOPPED cpus can never wake up */
>>>>> 63 if (s390_cpu_get_state(cpu) != S390_CPU_STATE_LOAD &&
>>>>> 64 s390_cpu_get_state(cpu) != S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING) {
>>>>> 65 return false;
>>>>> 66 }
>>>>> 67
>>>>> 68 if (!(cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD)) {
>>>>> 69 return false;
>>>>> 70 }
>>>>> 71
>>>>> 72 return s390_cpu_has_int(cpu);
>>>>> 73 }
>>>>>
>>>>> and in target/s390x/cpu.h:
>>>>>
>>>>> 772 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>>>>> 773 unsigned int s390_cpu_set_state(uint8_t cpu_state, S390CPU *cpu);
>>>>> 774 #else
>>>>> 775 static inline unsigned int s390_cpu_set_state(uint8_t cpu_state,
>>>>> S390CPU *cpu)
>>>>> 776 {
>>>>> 777 return 0;
>>>>> 778 }
>>>>> 779 #endif /* CONFIG_USER_ONLY */
>>>>> 780 static inline uint8_t s390_cpu_get_state(S390CPU *cpu)
>>>>> 781 {
>>>>> 782 return cpu->env.cpu_state;
>>>>> 783 }
>>>>>
>>>>> As cpu_state is never set, perhaps in case of linux-user it should
>>>>> always return S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING?
>>
>> Possibly, we should not have any state handling for linux-user.
>>
>
> I did that, but now 390_cpu_has_work() is false because
> CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD is not set in cs->interrupt_request.
>
> I think we should not enter in cpu_loop() with halted set to 1.
>
> Before the patch of this series, s390_cpu_reset() is called twice, and
> on the second call, halted is already 0.
>
> With start_powered_off set to true in initfn, on the first reset
> "halted" is 0 and on the second it is 1 (because it has been copied from
> start_powered_off) and so cpu_loop() starts with halted set to 1 and fails.
What is happening:
[without start_powered_off]
1- halted is set to 1 in s390x_cpu_initfn()
2- halted is set to 0 in s390x_cpu_reset() by parent_reset()
(cpu_common_reset()
3- cpu_loop() is always entered with halted set to 0
[with start_powered_off]
1- halted is set to start_powered_off (1) in s390x_cpu_reset() by
parent_reset() (cpu_common_reset()
2- cpu_loop() is always entered with halted set to 1
So in the first case, cpu_loop() is always started with halted set to 0
and in the second case with halted set to 1.
And I think, with linux-user, it should never be started with halted set
to 1.
We can't add a "#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY" in hw/core/cpu.c to set halted
to 0 because it is in the common files, but we can do:
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
index 73d7d6007e8e..749cd548f0f3 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
@@ -291,9 +291,9 @@ static void s390_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(obj);
cpu_set_cpustate_pointers(cpu);
- cs->start_powered_off = true;
cs->exception_index = EXCP_HLT;
#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
+ cs->start_powered_off = true;
object_property_add(obj, "crash-information", "GuestPanicInformation",
s390_cpu_get_crash_info_qom, NULL, NULL, NULL);
cpu->env.tod_timer =
Thanks,
Laurent
- [PULL 24/30] hw/ppc/ppc4xx_pci: Replace pointless warning by assert(), (continued)
- [PULL 24/30] hw/ppc/ppc4xx_pci: Replace pointless warning by assert(), David Gibson, 2020/09/03
- [PULL 30/30] spapr_numa: move NVLink2 associativity handling to spapr_numa.c, David Gibson, 2020/09/03
- [PULL 27/30] spapr: introduce SpaprMachineState::numa_assoc_array, David Gibson, 2020/09/03
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, Peter Maydell, 2020/09/06
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, David Gibson, 2020/09/06
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, Laurent Vivier, 2020/09/07
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/09/07
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, Laurent Vivier, 2020/09/07
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, Cornelia Huck, 2020/09/07
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, Laurent Vivier, 2020/09/07
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904,
Laurent Vivier <=
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/09/07
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, David Gibson, 2020/09/07
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, Cornelia Huck, 2020/09/08
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, Thiago Jung Bauermann, 2020/09/08