qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] accel: kvm: Add aligment check for kvm_log_clear_one_slo


From: Keqian Zhu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] accel: kvm: Add aligment check for kvm_log_clear_one_slot
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 16:11:31 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1


On 2020/12/15 19:55, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 03:19:48PM +0800, Keqian Zhu wrote:
>> The parameters start and size are transfered from QEMU memory
>> emulation layer. It can promise that they are TARGET_PAGE_SIZE
>> aligned. However, KVM needs they are qemu_real_page_size aligned.
>>
>> Though no caller breaks this aligned requirement currently, we'd
>> better add an explicit check to avoid future breaking.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>> index c5e06288eb..3d0e3aa872 100644
>> --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>> +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>> @@ -701,6 +701,11 @@ static int kvm_log_clear_one_slot(KVMSlot *mem, int 
>> as_id, uint64_t start,
>>      unsigned long *bmap_clear = NULL, psize = qemu_real_host_page_size;
>>      int ret;
>>  
>> +    /* Make sure start and size are psize aligned */
>> +    if (!QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(start, psize) || !QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(size, psize)) {
>> +        return -EINVAL;
>> +    }
>> +
>>      /*
>>       * We need to extend either the start or the size or both to
>>       * satisfy the KVM interface requirement.  Firstly, do the start
>> -- 
>> 2.23.0
>>
>>
> 
> It's not clear to me that this function has any restrictions on start
> and size. If it does, then please document those restrictions in the
> function's header and assert rather than return.

Hi drew,

The following code implicitly expands the clear area when start_delta is
not psize aligned.

  start_delta /= psize;

Thanks,
Keqian


> 
> Thanks,
> drew
> 
> .
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]