|
From: | John Snow |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 05/12] qapi/gen: use './builtin' for the built-in module name |
Date: | Wed, 16 Dec 2020 12:27:45 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1 |
On 12/16/20 3:35 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> writes:Use this in preference to 'None', which helps remove some edge cases in the typing. Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>Clearly better. Should've done it this way in commit c2e196a9b4 "qapi: Prepare for system modules other than 'builtin'".--- scripts/qapi/gen.py | 27 +++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/qapi/gen.py b/scripts/qapi/gen.py index a6dc991b1d03..0c5d1fee6088 100644 --- a/scripts/qapi/gen.py +++ b/scripts/qapi/gen.py @@ -245,23 +245,23 @@ def __init__(self, self._pydoc = pydoc self._genc: Optional[QAPIGenC] = None self._genh: Optional[QAPIGenH] = None - self._module: Dict[Optional[str], Tuple[QAPIGenC, QAPIGenH]] = {} + self._module: Dict[str, Tuple[QAPIGenC, QAPIGenH]] = {} self._main_module: Optional[str] = None@staticmethod- def _is_user_module(name: Optional[str]) -> bool: - return bool(name and not name.startswith('./')) + def _is_user_module(name: str) -> bool: + return not name.startswith('./')@staticmethod- def _is_builtin_module(name: Optional[str]) -> bool: - return not name + def _is_builtin_module(name: str) -> bool: + return name == './builtin'- def _module_dirname(self, name: Optional[str]) -> str:+ def _module_dirname(self, name: str) -> str: if self._is_user_module(name): return os.path.dirname(name) return ''- def _module_basename(self, what: str, name: Optional[str]) -> str:+ def _module_basename(self, what: str, name: str) -> str: ret = '' if self._is_builtin_module(name) else self._prefix if self._is_user_module(name): basename = os.path.basename(name) @@ -269,15 +269,14 @@ def _module_basename(self, what: str, name: Optional[str]) -> str: if name != self._main_module: ret += '-' + os.path.splitext(basename)[0] else:Possible drive-by improvement: assert name.startswith('./')
As long as nobody tells me to split that unrelated change into a new patch I'll happily add drive-by improvements upon request ;)
- name = name[2:] if name else 'builtin' - ret += re.sub(r'-', '-' + name + '-', what) + ret += re.sub(r'-', '-' + name[2:] + '-', what) return ret- def _module_filename(self, what: str, name: Optional[str]) -> str:+ def _module_filename(self, what: str, name: str) -> str: return os.path.join(self._module_dirname(name), self._module_basename(what, name))- def _add_module(self, name: Optional[str], blurb: str) -> None:+ def _add_module(self, name: str, blurb: str) -> None: basename = self._module_filename(self._what, name) genc = QAPIGenC(basename + '.c', blurb, self._pydoc) genh = QAPIGenH(basename + '.h', blurb, self._pydoc) @@ -290,8 +289,8 @@ def _add_user_module(self, name: str, blurb: str) -> None: self._main_module = name self._add_module(name, blurb)- def _add_system_module(self, name: Optional[str], blurb: str) -> None:- self._add_module(name and './' + name, blurb) + def _add_system_module(self, name: str, blurb: str) -> None: + self._add_module(f"./{name}", blurb)I like f-strings, I really do, but is f"./{name}" really clearer than './' + name ?
I tend to avoid string concatenation as a habit, but there's no greater reason; the old value needed updating and that's what fell out of my keyboard, I suppose.
def write(self, output_dir: str, opt_builtins: bool = False) -> None:for name in self._module: @@ -310,7 +309,7 @@ def _begin_user_module(self, name: str) -> None: def visit_module(self, name: Optional[str]) -> None: if name is None: if self._builtin_blurb: - self._add_system_module(None, self._builtin_blurb) + self._add_system_module('builtin', self._builtin_blurb) self._begin_system_module(name) else: # The built-in module has not been created. No code may
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |