Re: [PULL v2 00/11] testing and configure updates

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 18/12/20 18:17, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > I'm surprised about build.ninja and Makefile.ninja Don't they get
> > regenerated by the configure?

This just means that meson _looked_ at some moxie file, so the files are 
a dependency of configure.

> Even weirder, re-run configure and the list grows!
>
>    meson-private/microblazeel-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/sh4eb-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/xtensa-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/mips64-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/nios2-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/rx-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/tricore-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/s390x-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/microblaze-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/riscv64-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/riscv32-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/sparc64-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/arm-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/xtensaeb-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/sh4-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/mips-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/or1k-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/sparc-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/x86_64-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/avr-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/mips64el-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/mipsel-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/ppc-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/aarch64-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/i386-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/alpha-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/ppc64-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/hppa-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/m68k-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    meson-private/cris-softmmu-config-devices.mak.d
>    moxie-softmmu-config-devices.h
>    build.ninja

This is expected since there's still an unconditional "source 
hw/moxie/Kconfig".

Alex, would you like to just drop the deprecation patch?  I can pick it 
up in my tree and try to debug it.

Paolo