qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH qemu v12] spapr: Implement Open Firmware client interface


From: Alexey Kardashevskiy
Subject: Re: [PATCH qemu v12] spapr: Implement Open Firmware client interface
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 23:06:40 +1100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:84.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/84.0



On 19/12/2020 01:04, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 13:50:40 +1100
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote:

The PAPR platform which describes an OS environment that's presented by
a combination of a hypervisor and firmware. The features it specifies
require collaboration between the firmware and the hypervisor.

Since the beginning, the runtime component of the firmware (RTAS) has
been implemented as a 20 byte shim which simply forwards it to
a hypercall implemented in qemu. The boot time firmware component is
SLOF - but a build that's specific to qemu, and has always needed to be
updated in sync with it. Even though we've managed to limit the amount
of runtime communication we need between qemu and SLOF, there's some,
and it has become increasingly awkward to handle as we've implemented
new features.

This implements a boot time OF client interface (CI) which is
enabled by a new "x-vof" pseries machine option (stands for "Virtual Open
Firmware). When enabled, QEMU implements the custom H_OF_CLIENT hcall
which implements Open Firmware Client Interface (OF CI). This allows
using a smaller stateless firmware which does not have to manage
the device tree.

The new "vof.bin" firmware image is included with source code under
pc-bios/. It also includes RTAS blob.

This implements a handful of CI methods just to get -kernel/-initrd
working. In particular, this implements the device tree fetching and
simple memory allocator - "claim" (an OF CI memory allocator) and updates
"/memory@0/available" to report the client about available memory.

This implements changing some device tree properties which we know how
to deal with, the rest is ignored. To allow changes, this skips
fdt_pack() when x-vof=on as not packing the blob leaves some room for
appending.

In absence of SLOF, this assigns phandles to device tree nodes to make
device tree traversing work.

When x-vof=on, this adds "/chosen" every time QEMU (re)builds a tree.

This adds basic instances support which are managed by a hash map
ihandle -> [phandle].

Before the guest started, the used memory is:
0..4000 - the initial firmware
10000..180000 - stack

This OF CI does not implement "interpret".

Unlike SLOF, this does not format uninitialized nvram. Instead, this
includes a disk image with pre-formatted nvram.

With this basic support, this can only boot into kernel directly.
However this is just enough for the petitboot kernel and initradmdisk to
boot from any possible source. Note this requires reasonably recent guest
kernel with:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=df5be5be8735

Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---

The example command line is:

-c 0 /home/aik/pbuild/qemu-killslof-localhost-ppc64/qemu-system-ppc64 \
-nodefaults \
-chardev stdio,id=STDIO0,signal=off,mux=on \
-device spapr-vty,id=svty0,reg=0x71000110,chardev=STDIO0 \
-mon id=MON0,chardev=STDIO0,mode=readline \
-nographic \
-vga none \
-enable-kvm \
-m 2G \
-machine 
pseries,x-vof=on,cap-cfpc=broken,cap-sbbc=broken,cap-ibs=broken,cap-ccf-assist=off
 \
-kernel pbuild/kernel-le-guest/vmlinux \
-initrd t/le.cpio \
-drive 
id=DRIVE0,if=none,file=./p/qemu-killslof/pc-bios/vof/nvram.bin,format=raw \
-global spapr-nvram.drive=DRIVE0 \
-snapshot \
-smp 8,threads=8 \
-L /home/aik/t/qemu-ppc64-bios/ \
-trace events=qemu_trace_events \
-d guest_errors \
-chardev socket,id=SOCKET0,server,nowait,path=qemu.mon.tmux26 \
-mon chardev=SOCKET0,mode=control

---
Changes:
v12:
* split VOF and SPAPR


Thanks for the split. The VOF paths are now clearly identified in
the sPAPR code, and well guarded by a check on x-vof. Rest of the
patch looks good to me. I gave it a try with a stock fedora 33
kernel and initramfs and it booted really fast !
>
With the checkpatch complaints addressed,


They all are about the firmware, not QEMU ifself, do we enforce it for such things as firmwares too?



Acked-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>

and

Tested-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>


Thanks! Now I am thinking whether someone may want to use it for something else, like... dunno... ARM? :)


--
Alexey



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]