qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] hw/pci-host/bonito: Fixup pci.lomem mapping


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] hw/pci-host/bonito: Fixup pci.lomem mapping
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 13:13:21 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0

On 12/22/20 1:36 AM, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> 在 2020/12/22 上午4:45, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 写道:
>> On 12/19/20 8:18 AM, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>>> The original mapping had wrong base address.
>>> Fix by correct the base adress and merge three alias into
>>> a single.
>> Why merge? Beside, typo "address".
> 
> 
> Hi Philippe,
> 
> Thanks for your reviewing!
> 
> Because I can't understand why it was in three pieces.
> I was just trying to do what kernel as I don't have much knowledge with
> Fuloong2E.

You can find the information in the 'BONITO64 - "north bridge"
controller for 64-bit MIPS CPUs" datasheet from Algorithmics Ltd. 2001,
section "4.1. Address maps" and Table 4.1: "CPU/local bus address map".

See also "Design and Implementation of EBoot based on Godson Platform":
http://www.ecice06.com/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=10656

> 
> The kernel treated PCI region as a whole part[1] at 0x10000000 with size
> 0x0c000000.
> 
> It fixed long lasting radeonfb starting failure.
> 
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
>>> ---
>>>   hw/pci-host/bonito.c | 17 ++++++-----------
>>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/pci-host/bonito.c b/hw/pci-host/bonito.c
>>> index 43b79448a9..3a31ba42f2 100644
>>> --- a/hw/pci-host/bonito.c
>>> +++ b/hw/pci-host/bonito.c
>>> @@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static void bonito_pcihost_realize(DeviceState
>>> *dev, Error **errp)
>>>   {
>>>       PCIHostState *phb = PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(dev);
>>>       BonitoState *bs = BONITO_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(dev);
>>> -    MemoryRegion *pcimem_lo_alias = g_new(MemoryRegion, 3);
>>> +    MemoryRegion *pcimem_lo_alias = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
>>>         memory_region_init(&bs->pci_mem, OBJECT(dev), "pci.mem",
>>> BONITO_PCIHI_SIZE);
>>>       phb->bus = pci_register_root_bus(dev, "pci",
>>> @@ -616,16 +616,11 @@ static void bonito_pcihost_realize(DeviceState
>>> *dev, Error **errp)
>>>                                        dev, &bs->pci_mem,
>>> get_system_io(),
>>>                                        0x28, 32, TYPE_PCI_BUS);
>>>   -    for (size_t i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
>>> -        char *name = g_strdup_printf("pci.lomem%zu", i);
>>> -
>>> -        memory_region_init_alias(&pcimem_lo_alias[i], NULL, name,
>>> -                                 &bs->pci_mem, i * 64 * MiB, 64 * MiB);
>>> -        memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(),
>>> -                                    BONITO_PCILO_BASE + i * 64 * MiB,
>>> -                                    &pcimem_lo_alias[i]);
>>> -        g_free(name);
>>> -    }
>>> +    memory_region_init_alias(pcimem_lo_alias, OBJECT(dev), "pci.lomem",
>>> +                             &bs->pci_mem, BONITO_PCILO_BASE,
>>> +                             BONITO_PCILO_SIZE);
>> Why is your pci_mem mapped at 0?
> 
> It is actually started at 0x10000000.
> 
> As: #define BONITO_PCILO_BASE       0x10000000
> 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> [1]:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/arch/mips/loongson2ef/common/pci.c
> 
> 
> - Jiaxun
>>
>>> +    memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), BONITO_PCILO_BASE,
>>> +                                pcimem_lo_alias);
>>>         create_unimplemented_device("pci.io", BONITO_PCIIO_BASE, 1 *
>>> MiB);
>>>   }
>>>
> 
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]