qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: virtio: why no full reset on virtio_set_status 0 ?


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: virtio: why no full reset on virtio_set_status 0 ?
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 11:32:30 -0400

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 12:51:31PM +0200, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> Hi Michael and all,
> 
> I have started researching a qemu / ovs / dpdk bug:
> 
> https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/322122fb-619d-96f6-5c3e-9eabdbf3819a@redhat.com/T/
> 
> that seems to be affecting multiple parties in the telco space,
> 
> and during this process I noticed that qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c does not do a 
> full virtio reset
> in virtio_set_status, when receiving a status value of 0.
> 
> It seems it has always been this way, so I am clearly missing / forgetting 
> something basic,
> 
> I checked the virtio spec at https://docs.oasis-open.org/
> 
> and from:
> 
> "
> 4.1.4.3 Common configuration structure layout
> 
> device_status
> The driver writes the device status here (see 2.1). Writing 0 into this field 
> resets the device.
> 
> "
> 
> and
> 
> "
> 2.4.1 Device Requirements: Device Reset
> A device MUST reinitialize device status to 0 after receiving a reset.
> "
> 
> I would conclude that in virtio.c::virtio_set_status we should 
> unconditionally do a full virtio_reset.
> 
> Instead, we have just the check:
> 
>     if ((vdev->status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK) !=
>         (val & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK)) {
>         virtio_set_started(vdev, val & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
>     }
> 
> which just sets the started field,
> 
> and then we have the call to the virtio device class set_status 
> (virtio_net...),
> but the VirtioDevice is not fully reset, as per the virtio_reset() call we 
> are missing:
> 
> "
>     vdev->start_on_kick = false;
>     vdev->started = false;
>     vdev->broken = false;
>     vdev->guest_features = 0;
>     vdev->queue_sel = 0;
>     vdev->status = 0;
>     vdev->disabled = false;
>     qatomic_set(&vdev->isr, 0);
>     vdev->config_vector = VIRTIO_NO_VECTOR;
>     virtio_notify_vector(vdev, vdev->config_vector);
> 
>     for(i = 0; i < VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX; i++) {
>         ... initialize vdev->vq[i] ...
>     }
> "
> 
> Doing a full reset seems to fix the problem for me, so I can send tentative 
> patches if necessary,
> but what am I missing here?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Claudio
> 
> -- 
> Claudio Fontana
> Engineering Manager Virtualization, SUSE Labs Core
> 
> SUSE Software Solutions Italy Srl


So for example for pci:

    case VIRTIO_PCI_STATUS:


        ....

        if (vdev->status == 0) {
            virtio_pci_reset(DEVICE(proxy));
        }

which I suspect is a bug because:

static void virtio_pci_reset(DeviceState *qdev)
{
    VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy = VIRTIO_PCI(qdev);
    VirtioBusState *bus = VIRTIO_BUS(&proxy->bus);
    PCIDevice *dev = PCI_DEVICE(qdev);
    int i;

    virtio_bus_reset(bus);
    msix_unuse_all_vectors(&proxy->pci_dev);

    for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX; i++) {
        proxy->vqs[i].enabled = 0;
        proxy->vqs[i].num = 0;
        proxy->vqs[i].desc[0] = proxy->vqs[i].desc[1] = 0;
        proxy->vqs[i].avail[0] = proxy->vqs[i].avail[1] = 0;
        proxy->vqs[i].used[0] = proxy->vqs[i].used[1] = 0;
    }


so far so good

    if (pci_is_express(dev)) {
        pcie_cap_deverr_reset(dev);
        pcie_cap_lnkctl_reset(dev);

        pci_set_word(dev->config + dev->exp.pm_cap + PCI_PM_CTRL, 0);
    }

this part is wrong I think, it got here by mistake since the same
function is used for bus level reset.

Jason, Marcel, any input?

-- 
MST




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]