[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 15/15] hw/i386/pc_piix: Move i440fx' realize near its qdev_ne
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 15/15] hw/i386/pc_piix: Move i440fx' realize near its qdev_new() |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Jun 2023 16:51:55 +0200 |
On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 12:34:12 +0200
Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com> wrote:
> I440FX realization is currently mixed with PIIX3 creation. Furthermore, it is
> common practice to only set properties between a device's qdev_new() and
> qdev_realize(). Clean up to resolve both issues.
>
> Since I440FX spawns a PCI bus let's also move the pci_bus initialization
> there.
>
> Note that when running `qemu-system-x86_64 -M pc -S` before and after this
> patch, `info mtree` in the QEMU console doesn't show any differences except
> that
> the ordering is different.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com>
> ---
> hw/i386/pc_piix.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
> index 22173b122b..23b9725c94 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
> @@ -126,7 +126,6 @@ static void pc_init1(MachineState *machine,
> MemoryRegion *rom_memory;
> ram_addr_t lowmem;
> uint64_t hole64_size;
> - Object *i440fx_host;
>
> /*
> * Calculate ram split, for memory below and above 4G. It's a bit
> @@ -198,17 +197,43 @@ static void pc_init1(MachineState *machine,
> }
>
> if (pcmc->pci_enabled) {
> + Object *phb;
> +
> pci_memory = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> memory_region_init(pci_memory, NULL, "pci", UINT64_MAX);
> rom_memory = pci_memory;
> - i440fx_host = OBJECT(qdev_new(host_type));
> - hole64_size = object_property_get_uint(i440fx_host,
> +
> + phb = OBJECT(qdev_new(host_type));
> + object_property_add_child(OBJECT(machine), "i440fx", phb);
> + object_property_set_link(phb, PCI_HOST_PROP_RAM_MEM,
> + OBJECT(ram_memory), &error_fatal);
> + object_property_set_link(phb, PCI_HOST_PROP_PCI_MEM,
> + OBJECT(pci_memory), &error_fatal);
> + object_property_set_link(phb, PCI_HOST_PROP_SYSTEM_MEM,
> + OBJECT(system_memory), &error_fatal);
> + object_property_set_link(phb, PCI_HOST_PROP_IO_MEM,
> + OBJECT(system_io), &error_fatal);
> + object_property_set_uint(phb, PCI_HOST_BELOW_4G_MEM_SIZE,
> + x86ms->below_4g_mem_size, &error_fatal);
> + object_property_set_uint(phb, PCI_HOST_ABOVE_4G_MEM_SIZE,
> + x86ms->above_4g_mem_size, &error_fatal);
> + object_property_set_str(phb, I440FX_HOST_PROP_PCI_TYPE, pci_type,
> + &error_fatal);
> + sysbus_realize_and_unref(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(phb), &error_fatal);
> +
> + pci_bus = PCI_BUS(qdev_get_child_bus(DEVICE(phb), "pci.0"));
> + pci_bus_map_irqs(pci_bus,
> + xen_enabled() ? xen_pci_slot_get_pirq
> + : pc_pci_slot_get_pirq);
> + pcms->bus = pci_bus;
> +
> + hole64_size = object_property_get_uint(phb,
> PCI_HOST_PROP_PCI_HOLE64_SIZE,
> &error_abort);
before patch memory region links were set after the original
regions were initialized by pc_memory_init(), but after this
patch you 1st set links and only later pc_memory_init().
I doesn't look to me as a safe thing to do.
> } else {
> pci_memory = NULL;
> rom_memory = system_memory;
> - i440fx_host = NULL;
> + pci_bus = NULL;
> hole64_size = 0;
is it possible to turn these into initializers, and get rid of
'else' branch?
> }
>
> @@ -243,29 +268,6 @@ static void pc_init1(MachineState *machine,
> PIIX3State *piix3;
> PCIDevice *pci_dev;
>
> - object_property_add_child(OBJECT(machine), "i440fx", i440fx_host);
> - object_property_set_link(i440fx_host, PCI_HOST_PROP_RAM_MEM,
> - OBJECT(ram_memory), &error_fatal);
> - object_property_set_link(i440fx_host, PCI_HOST_PROP_PCI_MEM,
> - OBJECT(pci_memory), &error_fatal);
> - object_property_set_link(i440fx_host, PCI_HOST_PROP_SYSTEM_MEM,
> - OBJECT(system_memory), &error_fatal);
> - object_property_set_link(i440fx_host, PCI_HOST_PROP_IO_MEM,
> - OBJECT(system_io), &error_fatal);
> - object_property_set_uint(i440fx_host, PCI_HOST_BELOW_4G_MEM_SIZE,
> - x86ms->below_4g_mem_size, &error_fatal);
> - object_property_set_uint(i440fx_host, PCI_HOST_ABOVE_4G_MEM_SIZE,
> - x86ms->above_4g_mem_size, &error_fatal);
> - object_property_set_str(i440fx_host, I440FX_HOST_PROP_PCI_TYPE,
> - pci_type, &error_fatal);
> - sysbus_realize_and_unref(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(i440fx_host), &error_fatal);
> -
> - pci_bus = PCI_BUS(qdev_get_child_bus(DEVICE(i440fx_host), "pci.0"));
> - pci_bus_map_irqs(pci_bus,
> - xen_enabled() ? xen_pci_slot_get_pirq
> - : pc_pci_slot_get_pirq);
> - pcms->bus = pci_bus;
> -
> pci_dev = pci_create_simple_multifunction(pci_bus, -1, true,
> TYPE_PIIX3_DEVICE);
>
> @@ -290,7 +292,6 @@ static void pc_init1(MachineState *machine,
> rtc_state = ISA_DEVICE(object_resolve_path_component(OBJECT(pci_dev),
> "rtc"));
> } else {
> - pci_bus = NULL;
> isa_bus = isa_bus_new(NULL, system_memory, system_io,
> &error_abort);
>
- Re: [PATCH 08/15] hw/pci-host/i440fx: Have common names for some local variables, (continued)
[PATCH 12/15] hw/pci-host/i440fx: Add PCI_HOST_{ABOVE, BELOW}_4G_MEM_SIZE properties, Bernhard Beschow, 2023/06/11
[PATCH 14/15] hw/pci-host/i440fx: Resolve i440fx_init(), Bernhard Beschow, 2023/06/11
[PATCH 13/15] hw/pci-host/i440fx: Add I440FX_HOST_PROP_PCI_TYPE property, Bernhard Beschow, 2023/06/11