[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v9 09/15] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW
From: |
Janosch Frank |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v9 09/15] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:21:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 |
On 3/13/20 1:57 PM, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:21:45 -0400
> Janosch Frank <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Handling of CPU reset and setting of the IPL psw from guest storage at
>> offset 0 is done by a Ultravisor call. Let's only fetch it if
>> necessary.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
>> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> target/s390x/cpu.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
>> index 84029f14814b4980..a48d39f139cdc1c4 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
>> @@ -78,16 +78,20 @@ static bool s390_cpu_has_work(CPUState *cs)
>> static void s390_cpu_load_normal(CPUState *s)
>> {
>> S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(s);
>> - uint64_t spsw = ldq_phys(s->as, 0);
>> -
>> - cpu->env.psw.mask = spsw & PSW_MASK_SHORT_CTRL;
>> - /*
>> - * Invert short psw indication, so SIE will report a
>> specification
>> - * exception if it was not set.
>> - */
>> - cpu->env.psw.mask ^= PSW_MASK_SHORTPSW;
>> - cpu->env.psw.addr = spsw & PSW_MASK_SHORT_ADDR;
>> + uint64_t spsw;
>>
>> + if (!s390_is_pv()) {
>> + spsw = ldq_phys(s->as, 0);
>> + cpu->env.psw.mask = spsw & PSW_MASK_SHORT_CTRL;
>> + /*
>> + * Invert short psw indication, so SIE will report a
>> specification
>> + * exception if it was not set.
>> + */
>> + cpu->env.psw.mask ^= PSW_MASK_SHORTPSW;
>> + cpu->env.psw.addr = spsw & PSW_MASK_SHORT_ADDR;
>> + } else {
>> + s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_LOAD, cpu);
>> + }
>> s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING, cpu);
>> }
>> #endif
>
> I don't understand why you set the state to S390_CPU_STATE_LOAD and
> then immediately afterwards to S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING, especially
> considering that both do the same
>
Have a look at the specs, wee need to set the load state before setting
the cpu to operating.
I can add a comment to make it clearer if you want.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [PATCH v9 02/15] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility, Claudio Imbrenda, 2020/03/13
[PATCH v9 09/15] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/11
[PATCH v9 07/15] s390x: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/11
Re: [PATCH v9 07/15] s390x: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD, Claudio Imbrenda, 2020/03/13