qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/8] pc-bios: s390x: Consolidate timing functions into time.h


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] pc-bios: s390x: Consolidate timing functions into time.h
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:21:13 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0

On 24.03.20 16:08, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Let's consolidate timing related functions into one header.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
> ---
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/menu.c        |  1 +
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/netmain.c     | 15 +++----------
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h    | 18 ----------------
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/time.h        | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-net.c  |  1 +
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-scsi.c |  1 +
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c      | 18 +++-------------
>  7 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 pc-bios/s390-ccw/time.h
> 
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/menu.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/menu.c
> index ce3815b2010d20cb..7925c33248836913 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/menu.c
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/menu.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  #include "libc.h"
>  #include "s390-ccw.h"
>  #include "sclp.h"
> +#include "time.h"
>  
>  #define KEYCODE_NO_INP '\0'
>  #define KEYCODE_ESCAPE '\033'
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/netmain.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/netmain.c
> index 309ffa30d9922077..a8e2b1b6233735d8 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/netmain.c
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/netmain.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>  #include "s390-ccw.h"
>  #include "cio.h"
>  #include "virtio.h"
> +#include "time.h"
>  
>  #define DEFAULT_BOOT_RETRIES 10
>  #define DEFAULT_TFTP_RETRIES 20
> @@ -57,24 +58,14 @@ static SubChannelId net_schid = { .one = 1 };
>  static uint8_t mac[6];
>  static uint64_t dest_timer;
>  
> -static uint64_t get_timer_ms(void)
> -{
> -    uint64_t clk;
> -
> -    asm volatile(" stck %0 " : : "Q"(clk) : "memory");
> -
> -    /* Bit 51 is incremented each microsecond */
> -    return (clk >> (63 - 51)) / 1000;
> -}
> -
>  void set_timer(int val)
>  {
> -    dest_timer = get_timer_ms() + val;
> +    dest_timer = get_time_milli() + val;
>  }
>  
>  int get_timer(void)
>  {
> -    return dest_timer - get_timer_ms();
> +    return dest_timer - get_time_milli();
>  }
>  
>  int get_sec_ticks(void)
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h
> index 21f27e79906ea297..c5820e43aed143d0 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h
> @@ -74,8 +74,6 @@ unsigned long virtio_load_direct(ulong rec_list1, ulong 
> rec_list2,
>  bool virtio_is_supported(SubChannelId schid);
>  void virtio_blk_setup_device(SubChannelId schid);
>  int virtio_read(ulong sector, void *load_addr);
> -u64 get_clock(void);
> -ulong get_second(void);
>  
>  /* bootmap.c */
>  void zipl_load(void);
> @@ -144,24 +142,8 @@ static inline void debug_print_addr(const char *desc, 
> void *p)
>  #define KVM_S390_VIRTIO_SET_STATUS      2
>  #define KVM_S390_VIRTIO_CCW_NOTIFY      3
>  
> -static inline void yield(void)
> -{
> -    asm volatile ("diag 0,0,0x44"
> -                  : :
> -                  : "memory", "cc");
> -}
> -
>  #define MAX_SECTOR_SIZE 4096
>  
> -static inline void sleep(unsigned int seconds)
> -{
> -    ulong target = get_second() + seconds;
> -
> -    while (get_second() < target) {
> -        yield();
> -    }
> -}
> -
>  static inline void IPL_assert(bool term, const char *message)
>  {
>      if (!term) {
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/time.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/time.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000..98f5acaa33b500bd
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/time.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +#ifndef TIME_H
> +#define TIME_H
> +
> +static inline u64 get_clock(void)
> +{
> +    u64 r;
> +
> +    asm volatile("stck %0" : "=Q" (r) : : "cc");
> +    return r;
> +}
> +
> +static inline u64 get_time_milli(void)

Milli Vanilli?

Please, just use common abbreviations. "ms" is certainly good enough.


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]