qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] tests/tcg/s390x: Tests for Vector Enhancements Faci


From: David Miller
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] tests/tcg/s390x: Tests for Vector Enhancements Facility 2
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 14:26:55 -0400

Sorry,
   Didn't notice this, as it was on v4 patch emails.
I assume since there is no other follow up after a week,
 CI jobs are not being updated and I should change samples to use .insn.
I will try to get this out tomorrow.

Thanks,
- David Miller

On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 1:13 PM Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 22/03/2022 11.31, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 22/03/2022 09.53, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> On 22.03.22 01:04, David Miller wrote:
> > [...]
> >>> diff --git a/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target
> >>> b/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target
> >>> index 8c9b6a13ce..921a056dd1 100644
> >>> --- a/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target
> >>> +++ b/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target
> >>> @@ -16,6 +16,14 @@ TESTS+=shift
> >>>   TESTS+=trap
> >>>   TESTS+=signals-s390x
> >>> +VECTOR_TESTS=vxeh2_vs
> >>> +VECTOR_TESTS+=vxeh2_vcvt
> >>> +VECTOR_TESTS+=vxeh2_vlstr
> >>> +
> >>> +TESTS+=$(VECTOR_TESTS)
> >>> +
> >>> +$(VECTOR_TESTS): CFLAGS+=-march=z15 -O2
> >>
> >> @Thomas, will that survive our test framework already, or do we have to
> >> wait for the debain11 changes?
> >
> > Alex' update to the container has already been merged:
> >
> > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/89767579cad2e371b
> >
> > ... and seems like it's working in Travis on s390x, too:
> >
> > https://app.travis-ci.com/github/huth/qemu/jobs/564188977#L12797
> >
> > ... so it seems like it should be OK now (considering that we drop support
> > for the old Ubuntu version 18.04 in QEMU 7.1, too).
>
> Looks like I spoke a little bit too soon - some of the CI pipelines are
> still using Debian 10 for running the TCG tests, and they are failing with
> these patches applied:
>
> https://gitlab.com/thuth/qemu/-/jobs/2238422870#L3499
>
> Thus we either need to update the CI jobs to use Debian 11, or use
> handcrafted instruction opcodes here again...
>
>   Thomas
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]