RE: [QSOS-general] ideas QSOS v2 format

[Goneri Le Bouder]

Le 13/11/2006, "Pilot, Olivier" <address@hidden> a écrit:

>Hello,
> 
>Actually, I don't really see the problem with the first point. I mean, if 
>you're talking about a missing feature, it's quite ok to say that the 
>application you're assessing is "bad" from this point of view. It doesn't 
>shock me. However I agree with the second point.
I'm agree.

>I also have one request. I think it could be worth including the concept of 
>"mandatory" features when scoring. It could be interesting to have the choice 
>in putting either a weighting on a specific feature, either a "mandatory 
>flag". We currently have no mean to represent this using the QSOS format.
IMO, this is related to the scoring, not the way data are stored.

About the transition and as François said, tools are important and I
don't want to break the current sheets today. But what about a QSOS-dev
module to try new things and do a smooth transition after.

Regards,

          Gonéri