Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] [gnu.org #2110556] Savannah hosting requirements on documentation license

[Jing Luo]

On 2024-11-13 13:37, Richard Stallman wrote:
>   > GNUMP3d - no license on docs, hosted on Savannah, basically dead
>
> Could you be more specific than "basically dead"?
> Is it really dead?  Or just getting little maintenance?
> Does it have a maintainer?

I meant it hasn't had any new release for more than a decade, very 
likely has been superseded by another (non-gnu) package.

> If it has no maintainer, I can ask the Savannah hackers to fix the lack
> of license.

>   > gcl (common lisp) - no (explicit) license on docs, assumed GPL? 
> hosted
>   > on Savannah
>
> What does "assumed GPL?" mean?  That is not a clear description of the
> current situation.

gcl does not have a license or a copyright notice on docs [1]. It was my 
wishful thinking that because the docs live in the same git repository 
as the codes, I wanted to assume that the same COPYING file could be 
applied to docs, because I didn't really want to say the docs were 
nonfree.

[1] https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gcl.git/tree/gcl/doc

--
Jing Luo
About me: https://jing.rocks/about/
GPG Fingerprint: 4E09 8D19 00AA 3F72 1899 2614 09B3 316E 13A1 1EFC

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature