[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [security-discuss] CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: Freedom 0: the
From: |
Mike Gerwitz |
Subject: |
Re: [security-discuss] CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Mar 2017 23:23:24 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 00:21:20 +0300, Jean Louis wrote:
> While it is not directly relevant to Freedom 0 that a software package
> cannot be downloaded in some cases, by using Tor, it is lack of policy
> on FSF/GNU side, to permit GNU software to be distributed from such
> freedom denying service providers such as CloudFlare.
> Finally, when Tor is recommended by GNU website, than Tor should be
> allowed to access each and every GNU software piece.
This is the proper discussion to be having.
I agree. But so far the thread has been so muddied by unrelated issues
that consideration of this argument is being hampered.
--
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker+Activist | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
GPG: D6E9 B930 028A 6C38 F43B 2388 FEF6 3574 5E6F 6D05
Old: 2217 5B02 E626 BC98 D7C0 C2E5 F22B B815 8EE3 0EAB
https://mikegerwitz.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist, (continued)
- Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist, Brandon Invergo, 2017/03/09
- Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist, Nomen Nescio, 2017/03/09
- Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist, Brandon Invergo, 2017/03/09
- Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist, Nomen Nescio, 2017/03/09
- Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2017/03/10
- Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist, Richard Stallman, 2017/03/11
Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist, Nomen Nescio, 2017/03/09
- [security-discuss] CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist), Jean Louis, 2017/03/09
- Re: [security-discuss] CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist),
Mike Gerwitz <=
- Re: [security-discuss] CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist), Richard Stallman, 2017/03/11
- Re: [security-discuss] CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist), Jean Louis, 2017/03/11
- Re: [security-discuss] CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist), Richard Stallman, 2017/03/11
- Re: [security-discuss] CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist), carl hansen, 2017/03/12
[security-discuss] problem 5: GNU's Tor endorsement undermined (was: CloudFlare, not good choice), Anonymous, 2017/03/12
Re: [security-discuss] CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2017/03/10
Re: [security-discuss] CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist), Jean Louis, 2017/03/10
Re: [security-discuss] CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2017/03/10
Re: [security-discuss] CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist), Richard Stallman, 2017/03/11
Re: [security-discuss] CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist), Jean Louis, 2017/03/23