[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] DB_INIT_LOCK problems?
From: |
Yaron Minsky |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] DB_INIT_LOCK problems? |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Jul 2004 18:46:37 -0400 |
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 12:30:47 -0400, Jason Harris <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:10:40PM -0400, Yaron Minsky wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:15:45 -0400, Jason Harris <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> No, one single-threaded process writing a single record which updates
> multiple pages will deadlock its own self, due to the internal design
> of BDB's locking subsystem, even if it is the only process using a
> database.
>
Freaky. I guess that means you always need to run the deadlock
detector whenever you're using locking. And, further, that you need
to tolerate interrupts from the deadlock system.
Sigh. Seems like a royal pain to get this all working properly.
- Re: [Sks-devel] DB_INIT_LOCK problems?, (continued)
- Re: [Sks-devel] DB_INIT_LOCK problems?, Yaron Minsky, 2004/07/23
- Re: [Sks-devel] DB_INIT_LOCK problems?, Jason Harris, 2004/07/24
- Re: [Sks-devel] DB_INIT_LOCK problems?, Jason Harris, 2004/07/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] DB_INIT_LOCK problems?, Yaron Minsky, 2004/07/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] DB_INIT_LOCK problems?, Jason Harris, 2004/07/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] DB_INIT_LOCK problems?, Yaron Minsky, 2004/07/26
- Re: [Sks-devel] DB_INIT_LOCK problems?, Jason Harris, 2004/07/26
- Re: [Sks-devel] DB_INIT_LOCK problems?, Jason Harris, 2004/07/30
- Re: [Sks-devel] DB_INIT_LOCK problems?, Yaron Minsky, 2004/07/30
- Re: [Sks-devel] DB_INIT_LOCK problems?, Jason Harris, 2004/07/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] DB_INIT_LOCK problems?,
Yaron Minsky <=
- Re: [Sks-devel] DB_INIT_LOCK problems?, Peter Palfrader, 2004/07/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] DB_INIT_LOCK problems?, Erik Arneson, 2004/07/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] DB_INIT_LOCK problems?, Yaron Minsky, 2004/07/31