[Sks-devel] Re: [PATCH] unqueue the tqueue database even when mailsync is empty

[kaplan+sks]

Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:

> I don't know Jason Harris (and there are 27 keys with that name on the
> public keyservers) or i would have CC'ed him here, but maybe he'd be
> willing to extend the same courtesy to SKS users in general.  Maybe
> someone who knows Jason personally could ask him to weigh in on this
> discussion?

Searching the archive uncovered this.  No need for this patch anymore
then.

Kim Minh.

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: [Sks-devel] PKS network mailsync peers
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:59:08 -0500
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mutt/1.4.2.1i
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 02:16:58PM +1100, Jonathan Oxer wrote:
>
> > I just did some testing with the KJSL address as my mailsync peer and
> > any update messages I send it are rejected with a message that the
> > address is invalid:
> > 
> > Dec  6 13:46:56 keys postfix/qmgr[3199]: 4DC1543C190:
>
> Sorry about this outage.  Fortunately, it was fixed a few days ago
> by the owner of the hardware.  All SKS admins should (once again)
> feel free to add address@hidden as a mailsync
> peer.  This helps keep the SKS and pks/onak/OpenPKSD/OPKS (i.e.,
> non-SKS) keyserver networks in sync.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- 
> Jason Harris           |  NIC:  JH329, PGP:  This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it?
> address@hidden _|_ web:  http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/
>           Got photons?   (TM), (C) 2004
>
>
> --- End Message ---