[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service - what's the rationale?
From: |
Robert J. Hansen |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service - what's the rationale? |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:34:47 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 |
> On the server side, the only use case (which is actually a good use
> case), I see, would be that we could basically hide keyservers from
> powerful players, that may e.g. force a larger number of keyserver
> operators to delete, obstruct, etc. certain keys or parts of them,
> which may help them in their evil doings.
Even then, I'm unconvinced this is even possible. The footprint
associated with running a keyserver is vast and covers an awful lot more
than just anonymizing TCP/IP connections.
If you want to run an anonymous and deniable service then you're going
to need to break out some serious spy tradecraft: you're going to need
to find a hosting company that won't ask questions... maybe set up a
shell corporation to pay the bills... figure out some way to sanitize
all ties between you and the shell corporation... and all the while
you're doing this, you're becoming *more* visible to the Powers That Be,
because you're acting like either a foreign intelligence service or a
narcosyndicate.
Any discussion about anonymizing the server side needs to also include
provisioning, sanitization, and burn care. (Burn care: "oh crap, the
Bad Guys know my IP address and they're looking into the shell
corporation. What do I do now?" Burn care is what you do after you've
been burned.)
If you're not having a discussion about practical tradecraft, then
really, talk about server-side anonymity amounts to a bunch of exercises
in masturbatory paranoia.
And if you *are* having this discussion, then congratulations, you just
became Quite Interesting(tm) to some very interesting people.
I'm inclined to let this entire thing lie.
- [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service /onionbalance for hkp, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2015/11/12
- Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service /onionbalance for hkp, Malte, 2015/11/13
- Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service /onionbalance for hkp, Christoph Egger, 2015/11/13
- Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service /onionbalance for hkp, Malte, 2015/11/13
- Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service /onionbalance for hkp, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2015/11/13
- Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service - what's the rationale?, Christoph Anton Mitterer, 2015/11/13
- Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service - what's the rationale?,
Robert J. Hansen <=
- Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service - what's the rationale?, Christoph Anton Mitterer, 2015/11/13
- Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service - what's the rationale?, Robert J. Hansen, 2015/11/13
- Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service - what's the rationale?, Hendrik Grewe, 2015/11/13
- Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service - what's the rationale?, Christoph Anton Mitterer, 2015/11/13
- Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service - what's the rationale?, Alain Wolf, 2015/11/13
- Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service - what's the rationale?, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2015/11/13
- Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service - what's the rationale?, Christoph Anton Mitterer, 2015/11/13
- Message not available
- Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service - I2P node for internal use, too, echelon, 2015/11/16
- Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service - what's the rationale?, Lukas Martini, 2015/11/14
- Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service - what's the rationale?, malte, 2015/11/16