[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Social-discuss] Privacy-over-Webfinger Draft
|
From: |
Ted Smith |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Social-discuss] Privacy-over-Webfinger Draft |
|
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:10:37 -0400 |
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 14:37 +0200, Natanael wrote:
> (Sending again so the list gets it)
>
> Your anonymization suggestion sounds a lot like i2p. Gnu social could
> likely work over it unmodified.
> http://www.i2p2.de/
i2p fails for having everyone serve as a router - that means that
hidden-services (which is what it would be used for here) can be
de-anonymized by correlating their uptime with the uptime of the
routers.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part