[STUMP] pixmap vs. window again

[Julian Stecklina]

Hello,

I got this one several times today. Note that its "window instead of
pixmap" instead of the other way round.

ID 12582951 from display #<XLIB:DISPLAY :0 (The X.Org Foundation R10402000)> 
should have been a XLIB:PIXMAP, but was #<XLIB:WINDOW :0 C00027>
0: (SB-DEBUG::MAP-BACKTRACE #<CLOSURE (LAMBDA #) {BAFCC3D}>)[:EXTERNAL]
1: (SB-DEBUG:BACKTRACE 100 #<SB-IMPL::STRING-OUTPUT-STREAM {BAFCBE9}>)
2: (STUMPWM::BACKTRACE-STRING)
3: ((LAMBDA (STUMPWM::C)) #<XLIB:LOOKUP-ERROR {BAFC7F1}>)
4: (SIGNAL #<XLIB:LOOKUP-ERROR {BAFC7F1}>)[:EXTERNAL]
5: (ERROR XLIB:LOOKUP-ERROR)[:EXTERNAL]
6: (XLIB::X-ERROR XLIB:LOOKUP-ERROR)[:EXTERNAL]
7: (XLIB::LOOKUP-PIXMAP
    #<XLIB:DISPLAY :0 (The X.Org Foundation R10402000)>
    12582951)
8: (XLIB::DECODE-WM-HINTS
    #(103 1 1 12582943 0 0 0 12582951 12582913)
    #<XLIB:DISPLAY :0 (The X.Org Foundation R10402000)>)
9: (STUMPWM::WINDOW-URGENT-P #S(window "XChat" #xC00003))
10: (STUMPWM::RAISE-WINDOW #S(window "XChat" #xC00003))
11: (STUMPWM::FRAME-RAISE-WINDOW
     #S(STUMPWM::TILE-GROUP
        :SCREEN #S<screen #<XLIB:SCREEN :0.0 1440x900x24 TRUE-COLOR>>
        :WINDOWS (#S(window "XChat" #xC00003))
        :NUMBER 4
        :NAME "irc"
        :FRAME-TREE (#S(frame 0 #S(window "XChat" #xC00003) 0 0 1440 900))
        :LAST-FRAME NIL
        :CURRENT-FRAME #S(frame 0 #S(window "XChat" #xC00003) 0 0 1440 900))
     #S(frame 0 #S(window "XChat" #xC00003) 0 0 1440 900)
     #S(window "XChat" #xC00003)
     T)
12: (STUMPWM::HANDLE-EVENT)[:EXTERNAL]
13: ((FLET SB-THREAD::WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK-THUNK))
14: ((FLET #:WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS-BODY-[CALL-WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK]520))
15: (SB-THREAD::CALL-WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK
     #<CLOSURE (FLET SB-THREAD::WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK-THUNK) {B78CECBD}>
     #S(SB-THREAD:MUTEX
        :NAME "CLX Event Lock"
        :%OWNER #<SB-THREAD:THREAD "initial thread" {B1DD671}>
        :STATE 1))
16: (XLIB:PROCESS-EVENT #<XLIB:DISPLAY :0 (The X.Org Foundation 
R10402000)>)[:EXTERNAL]
17: (STUMPWM::STUMPWM-INTERNAL-LOOP)
18: (STUMPWM::STUMPWM-INTERNAL-LOOP)[:EXTERNAL]
19: (STUMPWM::STUMPWM-INTERNAL ":0")
20: (STUMPWM ":0")
21: ((LAMBDA ()))
22: ((LABELS SB-IMPL::RESTART-LISP))


Regards,
-- 
Julian Stecklina

Well, take it from an old hand: the only reason it would be easier to
program in C is that you can't easily express complex problems in C,
so you don't. - Erik Naggum (in comp.lang.lisp)

(Spam-Experiment: http://cthulhu.c3d2.de/~astro/badpit.html )

pgpELqzhiy6sL.pgp
Description: PGP signature